Enterprise tier: Q3 revenue rollup
+18.4% vs. prior period
Use case
Define account tiers once (SMB, mid-market, enterprise, strategic) and reuse the same segment definitions across finance and go-to-market reporting, with reconciled lineage on every tier rollup.
Segment rollups reconciled from
The old way
Knowing which accounts deserve the enterprise team and which stay self-serve isn't just a go-to-market call: it decides where revenue, comp, and forecast attention land for the rest of the cycle.
But the tiering behind that call is usually informal: a spreadsheet column one analyst maintains, redefined whenever the account list changes hands. Nothing forces the next report to agree with the last one.
One governed segment, everywhere
A guided walkthrough of a live model: every tier on screen still carries its own reconciled citation.
Account tiers, thresholds, and scoring inputs live in the definitions library once, finance and go-to-market read the same segment, not two versions of it.
A tier rollup is a modeled figure like any other: reconciled, cited, and traceable back to the accounts and periods behind it.
Scoring math runs through the same deterministic engine as the rest of the plan: no opaque model assigning a tier nobody can explain or re-derive.
Key features
Set the tier thresholds and scoring inputs in the definitions library one time, every dashboard, forecast, and go-to-market report reads the same segment from then on.
Roll an account up into a tier and the rollup carries the same reconciliation and citation trail as any other modeled figure, not a copy-pasted total.
Role-based access keeps sensitive account-level detail scoped to the people who should see it, even as the tier rollup is shared broadly.
Move an account to a new tier and every dependent rollup (revenue, comp, forecast) recomputes deterministically in place.
Not a rating. A chain.
Enterprise tier: Q3 revenue rollup
+18.4% vs. prior period
Mid-Market segment: bookings mix
+6.7% vs. prior period
Strategic accounts: retention variance
−2.1% vs. prior period
Keep exploring
Territory and quota assignments run against the same reconciled revenue base finance forecasts from, keeping both sides aligned on one number.
See it in actionRep, ramp, and territory-load plans connect to the same financial model, so a capacity change flows into cost and revenue forecasts together.
See it in actionSales forecasts run against bookings and revenue actuals already reconciled to the ledger, so sales and finance never quietly disagree.
See it in actionFrequently asked
Tier thresholds, scoring inputs, and the segment names themselves live in the definitions library: set them up once and every downstream report, forecast, and dashboard reads that same definition.
A CRM tag is a label with no lineage. A segment tier in Rexfin is a modeled rollup: reconciled to the accounts behind it and citable back to the source figures, the same way any other line in the plan is.
Yes. Move an account to a different tier and every dependent rollup (revenue, comp, capacity) recomputes deterministically, so the forecast never quietly drifts from the segmentation that fed it.
No. Scoring math runs through the same deterministic engine as the rest of the plan: the criteria are explicit and reproducible, not a black-box prediction nobody can re-derive.
That's exactly what this is built to prevent: one governed definitions layer means finance's "enterprise" segment and the pipeline report's "enterprise" segment are the same segment.
Yes. A tier rollup is checked and cited the same way any other modeled figure is: it is never a separate, unreconciled summary sitting alongside the real numbers.
No. The Excel, CSV, or PDF upload path works standalone, so segment definitions and scoring can be modeled before any live connection exists.
Get started
Book a walkthrough and we'll build your account tiers from a sample of your own actuals: reconciled, cited, and ready to reforecast the moment a tier changes.