Reconciled p.11
FY2025 consensus demand plan: East region
+9.4% vs. prior period
Use case
Sales & operations planning
Connect demand, supply, and financial plans on one reconciled model, so a shift in the demand forecast recomputes revenue and inventory cost together, instead of three spreadsheets reconciled by hand.
What holds S&OP back
A planning cycle shouldn’t run on three versions of the truth.
When demand, supply, and finance each keep their own copy of the plan, the S&OP meeting ends up debating whose number is right instead of what to do next.
- Demand, supply, and finance each plan in their own spreadsheet, reconciled by hand once a month if at all.
- A shift in the demand forecast sits in one tab until someone re-keys it into the financial model.
- Inventory cost and revenue assumptions drift apart because no one agrees which version is current.
- The S&OP meeting runs on last week’s export instead of the live, reconciled number everyone actually trusts.
One connected cycle
One model, from demand signal to the ledger.
A guided walkthrough of a live S&OP model: every figure on screen still carries its own citation.
A demand signal, not a guess
Demand plans sit on actuals already reconciled to the ledger, so the starting point for every S&OP cycle is a tied-out number, not a re-keyed export.
Operational and financial plans, aligned
Demand, supply, and the financial forecast recompute from one governed model, so operations and finance stop reconciling two versions after the fact.
Decisions made on cited numbers
Every figure on the S&OP screen can open onto the source it came from, so a cross-functional call is made on evidence, not a stale slide.
Key features
Built for sales & operations planning
One model across demand, supply, and finance
S&OP connects demand, supply, and the financial plan on one reconciled model instead of three spreadsheets stitched together by hand every cycle.
58% Baseline
84% Best case
36% Downturn
A shared view across every function in the room
Sales, ops, and finance work from the same governed definitions during the S&OP cycle, so a demand number means the same thing to everyone at the table.
A demand shift, recomputed everywhere
Change a demand assumption in plain language and the revenue and inventory-cost impact recompute deterministically: the same model, not a second pass.
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Built on actuals already reconciled from
- PDF filings
- Bank statements
- ERP exports
- ZATCA e-invoices
- Excel schedules
Not a rating. A chain.
Every figure in the S&OP cycle can show its own proof.
- 1 Filed
- 2 Extracted
- 3 Reconciled
- 4 Cited
- 5 Exported
Reconciled p.22
Inventory cost scenario: Q3 rebalance
−4.8% vs. prior period
Reconciled p.17
Supply constraint impact: Revenue
+2.1% vs. prior period
Keep exploring
Other planning surfaces on the same model
Demand & inventory planning
Demand and inventory assumptions connect into the same model as the financial forecast, so stocking decisions and cash flow stay consistent.
Open this use caseSupply chain planning
Supply-chain planning runs as a connected surface over the same reconciled model, with any cost or cash-flow impact flowing through with full lineage.
Open this use caseRevenue growth management
Pricing, discounting, and mix scenarios model against the same reconciled revenue base, with margin and forecast lines recomputing automatically.
Open this use caseFrequently asked
Questions about sales & operations planning.
How does S&OP here differ from three spreadsheets and a meeting?
Demand, supply, and the financial plan read from and write to the same reconciled model, so the number sales presents, the number ops plans against, and the number finance forecasts from are always the same figure.
What happens to the financial forecast when the demand plan changes?
The change recomputes deterministically through to revenue and inventory cost in the same model; there is no separate hand-off step where someone re-enters the new number into a finance tab.
Can we test a supply constraint or a demand shock without breaking the live plan?
Yes. A scenario stays tied to the underlying reconciled base case, so a what-if recomputes on its own branch rather than overwriting the consensus plan the room is aligned on.
Where do the demand and supply actuals in the model come from?
From the same ingestion and reconciliation path as the rest of the platform: accounting and ERP exports, bank feeds, or uploaded Excel/CSV/PDF, normalized and checked against printed totals before anything becomes citable.
Can I ask the model a plain-language question mid-meeting instead of pulling a new report?
The Analyst agent answers questions over the model and its cited actuals in plain language, retrieving figures and running the calculation live, always citing what it computed from.
Is percentage-of-completion or a full supply-chain optimization engine included today?
S&OP is described here at capability level as part of the founder-directed planning scope; specific mechanics beyond what is documented on this page are on the roadmap and will carry a "Coming soon" label until shipped.
Get started
Run the next S&OP cycle on one model, not three.
Book a walkthrough and we'll connect a sample demand plan to your own reconciled actuals: one model, cited end to end, ready for the next cycle.